|
UN to vote on new Iran resolution |
|
|
|
|
Written by Rola
|
|
Friday, 23 March 2007 |
Lebanon news, Lebanese radio
station , world news, music, discover Lebanon, visit Beirut, Radio sawt
Beirut
Book Hotels to
Lebanon and the middle east , Europe, America for a very cheap prices
Mobile contents, ring
tones, games, wallpapers , backgrounds and more..
|
The five permanent members of the UN Security Council, along with Germany, have submitted the final draft of a resolution to press Iran to suspend uranium enrichment and want the council to vote on Saturday.
The major powers made only minor amendments to the draft and rejected a South African proposal on a 90-day "time out".
Changes proposed by Indonesia and Qatar for the Middle East to be free of weapons of mass destruction were also rejected. Last week the six major powers agreed on a new sanctions package which mainly expanded the list of Iranian individuals and companies subject to an assets freeze. Alejandro Wolff, the acting US ambassador to the UN, said only amendments consistent with previous resolutions were retained. Amendments "not in keeping with the architecture in place" were rejected, he added. Iran's case Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran's president, said he would make new proposals to resolve the dispute but continued to reject demands to suspend uranium enrichment. He has asked to speak before the council votes. "Our proposals will be based on rights and laws and on the inalienable rights of all nations. Not only on what the US or Great Britain wants," Ahmadinejad told French media on Thursday. The sponsors of the new draft added language underlining that the UN nuclear watchdog "is internationally competent for verifying compliance with safeguards agreements, including the non-diversion of nuclear material for non-peaceful purposes". Dumisani Kumalo, South Africa's ambassador and this month's council chairman, described the changes as "cosmetic". "We are disappointed because we made the amendments in good faith," he said. "We expected they would give our capitals a chance to look at what they could accommodate... I don't know what is left for my minister to do. Voting on Saturday Emyr Jones Parry, Britain's UN envoy Emyr Jones Parry, Britain's envoy, said South Africa's proposal was rejected because it would have been "totally perverse" to "reward non-compliance of Iran's obligations". "The only views which we have not taken account of are those which are so contrary to everything this council has done previously that we were totally unable to take them into account," he said. "The text that we have submitted is one which we believe finds the centre of gravity of the debate," he added. "It's an appropriate, proportional, incremental response to the situation." On Saturday's voting, Parry said: "We'll meet tomorrow for one final consideration. But the text is in blue," indicating it was ready for an imminent vote. " |